1990 (2) TMI 322

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the correctness and legality of the judgment of the High Court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench setting aside the judgment and order of the Special Judge, Barabanki and allowing the appeal preferred by the respondent/accused. The respondent took his trial before the Special Judge for offences punishable under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 10/- smeared with phenolphthalein. On a signal given by Ambar Prasad, the vigilance police with two other independent trap witnesses PWs 4 and 5 went into the office of Tehsildar, recovered a sum of Rs. 10/- from the respondent after following all formalities. Thereafter, the charge-sheet was filed. 3. The respondent has totally denied of having received any amount from Ambar Prasad and stated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... resence of other persons without taking any precaution is not convincing. 3) There is no acceptable reason as to why Ambar Prasad who had promised to give the bribe money on 8.11.79 came even on 5.11.79 with the vigilance party. 4) Though Ambar Prasad agreed to pay Rs. 15/-, he paid only Rs. 10/-. 5) The application said to have been presented by Ambar Prasad is not found. 6) N .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X