TMI Blog2024 (2) TMI 168X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by HC [ 2017 (9) TMI 1589 - DELHI HIGH COURT] reasons to believe contained the names of the very same five companies which were initially disclosed by the Petitioner during the assessment proceedings. The number of shares subscribed to by the said companies is the same and the amount received has been disclosed by the Assessee. There is no new material which has been found or mentioned in the rea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tkarsh Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vikas Kumar, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. Heard the learned Additional Solicitor General. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court. Hence, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|