TMI Blog2024 (2) TMI 285X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iod Feb-2018 to March-2020 - HELD THAT:- Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case particularly the nature of allegation as well as gravity of offence and the role played by the applicant, it is opined that this is not a fit case, in which bail may be granted to the present applicant Saurabh Kumar. Accordingly, this application of the present applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is her ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... used with the crime. Nothing incriminating material has been seized from the possession of the applicant/accused. The applicant/accused is in custody since 24.10.2023. He is permanent resident of Inidrapuram Neetkhand, District Ghaziabad (Uttar Pradesh) and there is no possibility of his absconsion. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iled GST returns for both these firms along with e-way bill generation. Therefore, the applicant/accused is clearly involved in the creation and operation of M/s Savita Traders 07BMYPC5584N1Z3 and M/s JK Shrimali Enterprises 07AVUPY2198J1ZG and has fraudulently passed on fake ITC to the tune of Rs.8,99,46,939/- approx. Further, he had filed GST returns and e-way bill for an additional 10 GSTINS, a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o attempted to influence witnesses, such as Vineet Chauhan and also throw away his mobile phone and did not provide important documents and copies of fake invoices and Eway Bills and attempted to destroy the evidence. The applicant/accused is the key person behind the operation of 12 fake or non-existent firms. Under these circumstances, the applicant is not entitled to get the benefit of bail. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|