Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (2) TMI 988

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 0/-, then the stamp duty of such property in excess of such consideration is the income chargeable under the head income from other sources. Where the value of the property is disputed, the Ld. AO may make the reference for value of such property to the district valuation officer and such valuation shall be final. In the present case, the Assessee received 1/5th share in the above property in excess of agreed consideration. Therefore, the addition in the hands of the Assessee can only be made at the rate of 1/5th of the above difference between agreed consideration and valuation made by the Ld. DVO. This is the only request of the AR before us. The ground No.1 challenging the valuation of the property as agricultural land was not pres .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... IT (A) erred in confirming addition to the extent of Rs.44, 17, 484 /- u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) of the 1. Tax Act 1961, on account of purchase of agricultural land situated at village Thanenahve, Taluka Khalapur, Dist. Raigad, not appreciating that the provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the I.T Act, 1961 are not attracted to the facts of the transaction and therefore the entire addition of Rs.44,17,484/- is unjustified and required to be deleted. 2. The Hon. CIT (A) erred in confirming addition to the extent of Rs.44,17,484/- u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income.Tax Act 1961, on account of purchase of agricultural land situated at village Thanenahve, Taluka Khalapur, Dist. Raigad, incorrectly computing the deemed income u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) at R .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e hands of Assessee. It was further stated that purchase of land was for the purpose of charitable activity. 6. The Ld. AO noted that the land purchased by the Assessee and other parties is a non-agricultural land. The agreed value of the consideration is Rs.1.54 crores which has been paid by two other co-owners other than the Assessee whose stamp duty value is Rs.3,31,00,000/- and therefore 1/5th of the total value of the purchase of land being stamp duty value plus stamp duty registration purchase amounting to Rs.3,45,79,420/- is chargeable to tax being Rs.69,15,884/- in the hands of the Assessee under section 56 (2) (x) of the Act. Assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act dated 26.12.2016 was passed making such additions. 7 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... with the above appellate order. The Ld. Authorized Representative has submitted a paper book containing 60 pages and a written submission made before the Ld. CIT (A). The Ld. Authorized Representative also submitted the assessment order in case of Shri Murarilal Surajmal Mody for assessment year 2014-15 wherein the Ld. AO has made the addition under section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Act to the tune of Rs.62,06,494/-. Therefore, it was submitted that when complete addition of difference between stamp duty value and consideration as per sale deed has already been added in the hands of Shri Murarilal Surajmal Mody, in whose name the release deed is made by 5 parties, no addition required to be made in the hands of the Assessee. 10. The Ld. DR ve .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... stamp duty valuation by an amount exceeding Rs.50,000/-, then the stamp duty of such property in excess of such consideration is the income chargeable under the head income from other sources. Where the value of the property is disputed, the Ld. AO may make the reference for value of such property to the district valuation officer and such valuation shall be final. In the present case, the Assessee received 1/5th share in the above property in excess of agreed consideration. Therefore, the addition in the hands of the Assessee can only be made at the rate of 1/5th of the above difference between agreed consideration and valuation made by the Ld. DVO. In fact, this is the only request of the Ld. AR before us. The ground No.1 challenging the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates