Tribunal Upholds AO's Share Valuation Method, Quashes Revision Order, Aligns with Supreme Court's View on Income Tax Act.

Revision u/s 263 - 56(2)(x)(c)(B) - FMV purchases exceeds the price of shares - The tribunal observed that, the option to adopt either NAV or DCF Method for valuing the shares has been given to an Assessee in the statute itself. When the A.O. has appreciated this option availed by the Assessee, his order cannot be construed as erroneous. - Further, it is observed that it is not a case wherein the Assessing Officer failed to conduct enquiry rather it is the case wherein the AO has conducted an elaborate enquiry and adopted one of the two views which was plausible view. - Consequently, the ITAT following the decision of Supreme Court, quashed the revision order. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X