9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (3) TMI 150X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ereby, the application filed by the petitioner under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (briefly 'the Act' hereinafter) seeking for condonation of delay in filing the return for Assessment year 2001-02 claiming refund of Rs. 1,89,283/-, has been rejected. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had filed the original income-tax return on 31.07.2001 for the assessment year 2001-02 declaring a business loss of Rs. 5,00,000/- on estimate basis. The said return was processed under Section 143 of the Act by respondent No.3. The petitioner had subsequently filed revised return on 10.06.2003 declaring loss of Rs. 7,99,934/-. Along with the return, the petitioner had also claimed for refund of tax deducted at source on re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tax deducted at source from such rental income. The TDS certificates had been issued to the applicant prior to the time available for filing the revised return u/s. 139(4) of the Act. In the circumstances, I am of the opinion that the refund claim of the applicant is supplementary in nature. It does not satisfy the essential condition for condoning the delay in filing the return as laid down in the Instructions issued by the CBDT in F.No.225/208/93-IT(A-II), dt:12.10.1993. In view of the above, the delay in filing the revised return beyond statutory time limit and after the original return had been processed is not condoned". 5. A plain reading of the aforesaid operative part of the order passed by respondent No.1 would clearly reflect t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in the Circular dated 12.10.1993 referred in the preceding paragraphs. The relaxed conditions in terms of the Circular dated 30.10.2003 for ready reference are being reproduced herein under: "(i) the refund has arisen as a result of excess tax deducted/collected at source and payments of advance tax under the provisions of Chapters XVIIB, XVIIBB and XVIIC, respectively and the amount of refund does not exceed Rs. 5,00,000/- for any one assessment year; (ii) the income of the assessee is not assessable in the hands of any other person under any of the provisions of the Act; (iii) no interest will be admissible on the belated refund claims; (iv) if the refund arises from the return of income filed for the first time, then the CCIT wi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ould had been applicable or not so far as the claim of the petitioner is concerned. 11. A plain reading of the Circular dated 30.10.2003 would give a clear indication that the authorities concerned vide the said Circular had relaxed and modified the conditions stipulated in the previous Circular dated 12.10.1993 both in respect of the upper limit so far as claim of refund amount is concerned and also as regards the aspect whether it was in the form of a supplementary additional claim or not. 12. In view of the fact that the Circular dated 30.10.2003 was already in force when the impugned order was passed, we find it difficult to accept the contention of respondent No.1. The claim of the petitioner for refund of TDS was for an amount of Rs ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
