2018 (4) TMI 1977

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... I vs. Taikisha Engineering India Ltd.[ 2014 (12) TMI 482 - DELHI HIGH COURT] where the Court held that unless the AO rejects the explanation that induces the necessity to offer a specific amount as expenditure by some reasons, the mere rejection per se is unacceptable. The ITAT followed that decision; therefore, no question of law arises on this aspect. MAT Computation - Second question urged by t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... x Rules, 1962. This issue is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of 'Commissioner of Income Tax-VI vs. Taikisha Engineering India Ltd.', 370 ITR 338 (Delhi), where the Court held that unless the AO rejects the explanation that induces the necessity to offer a specific amount as expenditure by some reasons, the mere rejection per se is unacceptable. The ITAT followed that decision; th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X