2022 (4) TMI 1602

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... COMMON ORDER These Criminal Original Petitions had been filed to quash the case in C.C.Nos.3151 & 3150 of 2017 on the file of the learned XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai. 2. When the case came up for hearing, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner is the Director of the Company, but she was not in-charge of the day to day affairs of the Company and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Petitioner herein had not replied to the statutory notice. The Petitioner herein is arrayed as A-3 in the private Complaint had given promises that she will be responsible to pay the balance and share of the said outstanding. 5. It is the contention of the learned Counsel for the Respondent that what are all argued by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is to be considered only during trial .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the quashing of criminal complaint. What are all argued by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner can be agitated as valuable defence of the Accused before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate. 7. These Criminal Original Petitions are dismissed with direction to the XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai to proceed with the trial and dispose of the case within a period of three months f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X