2002 (8) TMI 893

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Mr. D.N. Patel, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents waives service of Rule. 2. What is challenged in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is the order dated 25th January 2001 (Annexure 'E') passed by respondent No.3 Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Division-VI, Surat-1 determining the capacity of production in the petitioners' processing house for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s that the impugned order dated 25th January 2001 Annexure 'E' was issued by respondent No.3 without giving the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The impugned order therefore suffers from the vice of breach of the principles of natural justice and, therefore, deserves to be quashed and set aside. 5. In view of the above discussion, the petition is allowed. The impugned or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X