Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (5) TMI 607

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pondent No. 2 in their affidavit filed in this Court and their reply filed before the trial Court. It is also pertinent to note that the GST investigation of the Company was done, sometime in 2021 and that the petitioner had appeared before the authorities on behalf of the said Company. It also appears that a full-fledged inquiry was done in 2021 and the authorities had audited the accounts of the years 2017 to 2020. The time span mentioned by the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 for generating the GST returns and getting the Dowment Identification Number (DIN), prima facie appears to be an eyewash and appears to have been done to show, that the petitioner was produced within 24 hours. There was no reason for the respondent No. 2 to keep the petition .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... RDER (PER REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) : 1. By this petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing and setting aside of his arrest by the respondent No. 3-Inspector, CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai (West Commissionerate) and for a declaration that the said arrest is illegal and contrary to law. Other prayers are also sought, including the prayer for interim cash bail / regular bail. 2. Mr. Ponda, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that the investigation carried out by the respondent No. 2 i.e. CGST relates to an old case of 2021. He submitted that in the case of 2021, summons were issued to Om Sai Nityanand Management Pvt. Ltd. in October 2021, asking the Company to produce recor .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oad it for 4 hours. He submitted that the mention of the said fact in the affidavit of the respondent No. 2 is nothing but an endeavour to explain the delay for non-production of the petitioner within 24 hours. He further submitted that if the timeline as set out in the affidavit is seen, there is a delay of 13 hours, which delay was not mentioned by the respondent No. 2 in their reply filed to the application preferred by the petitioner opposing the petitioner s remand before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate on 15th April 2024. Mr. Ponda pointed out to the contradictions in the reply filed by the respondent No. 2 before the learned Magistrate and the reply filed in this Court and the contrary stand taken by the respondent No. 2 in the s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the petitioner is arrested, is an old case and that the petitioner was arrested, despite paying taxes and as such, the arrest smacks of arbitrariness and high-handedness. Learned counsel relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Arnab Manoranjan Goswami v. State of Maharashtra (2021) 2 SCC 427, in particular, paragraph 68 thereof. 4. Learned ASG, opposed the petition and submitted that the arrest was legal and there is no merit in the submission of the petitioner that he was illegally detained by the respondent No. 2. Learned ASG relied on the affidavit filed by the respondent No. 2, setting out the timeline from the time, the petitioner entered the office of the respondent No. 2 till he was produced before the Magistrate. He .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the petitioner overnight, when he came on 13th March 2023, more particularly, if the respondent No. 2 did not have documents to question the petitioner. It is not as if, the petitioner had not cooperated with the authorities and as such, it was well within the powers of the respondent No. 2 to call him on some other day or even on the next day. We deprecate the practice of keeping a person overnight under the guise of recording of his statement, irrespective of whether the person volunteered or not. Arrest is a serious matter and cannot be made in a routine manner on a mere allegation of commission of an offence, inasmuch as, an arrest can cause incalculable harm to the reputation and self esteem of a person. 6. The Apex Court in Arnab Man .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates