9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (12) TMI 1513X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d. However, over the next two months, if the Petitioner fully cooperates with the SFIO, the Court is willing to reconsider the issue. Accordingly, list this matter on 20th March, 2023. - Justice Prathiba M. Singh For the Petitioner : Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Varma, Mr. Rasveen Kaur Kapoor and Ms. Shruti, Advs. With Mr. Himanshu Kohili. For the Respondent : Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr. Gokul Sharma, G.P. for UOI. (M:9045885304) Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Mr. Kaushal Kait Mr. Shivam Tiwary, Advocates (M:9811418995, 8826553426. ORDER PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. CM APPL. 45379/ 2020 has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner - Pawanjot Kaur Sawhney seeking ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iod of one week from today the petition may be called again on 28.11.2022, to review progress as also for considering the passing of orders permitting the petitioner to travel in the interim notwithstanding the existence of the LOC which stands impugned. 6. On the last date of hearing, vide order dated 28th November 2022 this Court sought status report from the Petitioner, in respect of the compliance of the conditions laid down in paragraph 6 of the aforementioned order dated 9th November, 2022. Report was also sought from the Respondent. The conditions that were to be satisfied in order for the Petitioner to be permitted to travel abroad are as follows: (i) Providing all details in respect to bank accounts that may be maintained by her in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s been non-cooperation by the Petitioner as the bank account statements beyond the 2 years period are not being provided. II. Authorised Representative shall appear before the SFIO and attend to the summons to be issued in the course of investigation. 11. Insofar as this condition is concerned, the authorised representative who has been appointed on behalf of the Petitioner is one Mr. Himanshu Kohli , a Company Secretary (CS) who only qualified as a CS in 2020. He is present in Court today and upon being queried by the Court he submits that he has not met the Petitioner and has been engaged recently by the ld. Counsel for the Petitioner. The Court at this stage is not satisfied with the authorised representative as he does not seem to have ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n in the investigation, however, as per her statements which have been placed on record, which have been shown to the Court, she claims to have no knowledge of the businesses of the aforementioned companies. Her husband having passed away, the records and other details of the companies are obviously with the Petitioner and her son. 15. On being queried by the Court, the ld. Counsel for the Petitioner is unwilling to disclose the whereabouts of the Petitioner s son, where is he engaged currently and what kind of business he is involved in. Moreover, as per the statements on record, the Petitioner is refusing to provide bank account statements of her own bank accounts beyond the two year period. Conclusion 16. As per the facts of this matter ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
