9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (5) TMI 922X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ER This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Ms. S. Devi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S.C. Mohanty, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue. 3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the orders passed by the authority under Annexures-4, 5 and 6, and to issue direction to the opposite parties to disclose the broad outcome of t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e proceeding before anybody. Therefore, no illegality or irregularity has been committed by the authority in passing the orders impugned, which do not require any interference of this Court. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court finds that the petitioner has filed an application under the Right to Information Act to get the following infor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... angi have been filling Income Tax Return on a regular basis or not. 7. Whether Mr. Harmohan Sarangi & Mr. Himanshu Sarangi has disclosed the source of their income which can accumulate to Rs. 19 lacs in Financial year 2015-16. 8. Whether Mr. Harmohan Sarangi & Himanshu Sarangi justified the sources of funds (19 lacs rupees) used for marriage expenses and dowry. 9. Details of the source of fu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on, it appears that the petitioner wanted to get information pertaining to tax evasion petition against Harmohan Sarangi and Himansu Sarangi (sent to office vide speed post ref:R08002098781N dated 06.08.2017). But such information, in any way, do not indicate that the petitioner has made a query and sought for information with regard to disclosure of broad outcome of tax evasion petition under Ann ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the application filed by the petitioner under Annexure-2. As such, the claim of the petitioner with regard to supply of information sought for in the application filed under Right to Information Act, is not permissible in view of the provisions contained under clause (i) of Section 8 (1) of the Right to Information Act. 8. In the above view of the matter, this Court is of the considered view that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
