The ITAT Delhi held that the addition for unexplained investment made to a company was unjustified. The...

The ITAT Delhi held that the addition for unexplained investment made to a company was unjustified. The Tribunal found that the total investments were made through a banking channel, specifically after withdrawals from an Axis Bank Account. The source of deposits in the account was explained and admitted, making the addition on account of withdrawals irrational. The addition from an undisclosed source related to a bridal business was based on suspicion, with the AO and CIT(A) erroneously holding 30% of deposits. The Tribunal considered the nature of the business and calculated the security amount at 10% of the hire charges. The assessee satisfactorily explained the bank entries, leading to the appeal being allowed due to a miscarriage of justice. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X