9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (7) TMI 172X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... therefore, warranted. The petitioner cannot be absolved of complete responsibility for the current state of affairs in as much as the petitioner did not submit all necessary documents. Therefore, it is necessary to put the petitioner on terms so as to safeguard revenue interest to some extent. The impugned order dated 25.04.2024 is set aside subject to the condition that the petitioner remits a sum of Rs. 50,00,000/- within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order - Petition dipsosed off. - Honourable Mr. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy For the Petitioner : Mr. G. Gokul Kishore For the Respondents : Mr. T.N.C. Kaushik, AGP (T) ORDER An order dated 25.04.2024 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner wa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... crores out of the total GST demand of about Rs. 100 crores. Learned counsel also points out that the documentation was voluminous and that it was not possible to provide copies of every invoice to the assessing officer within the limited time available. He points out that substantially similar issues were raised for the subsequent assessment period, but proceedings were dropped by accepting the petitioner's explanation. On instructions, learned counsel submits that the petitioner agrees to remit Rs. 50,00,000/- towards the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. 4. Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondents. He points out that principles of natural justice were complied with by is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y have not even filed the ledger copy also. They have not filed any copy of documents for verification such as copy of contract agreements made by the company with other construction companies, 80% of the payment made, GST paid details, etc. Without furnishing any documents, the contentions now putforth by the taxpayers are not accepted. On 5.4.2024, the representative of the company appeared, at the time of appearance also, requested to file the list along with copy of documents in chronological order for verification. But till the date, the taxpayers have not filed the list along with copy of documents. Hence, I hereby confirmed the proposal. The petitioner's reply was to the effect that a sum of Rs. 398,11,81,718/- was the provision ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
