Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (1) TMI 1448

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ejudicial to the interest of the appellant and at any rate is opposed to the principles of equity, natural justice and fair play. 2. That the Ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the order of the Assessing Officer is without jurisdiction. 3. a) That on the facts of the case and circumstances and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition of INR 1,54,54,792 made by the Assessing Officer ('AO') considering share premium received as income from other sources under section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('Act'); b) That on the facts of the case and circumstances and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the provisions of section 56(2)(viib) of the Act are effective only from AY 2013 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s noticed that the assessee had authorized share capital of Rs.5 lakh and subscribed and paid up capital of Rs. 3,84,620. The assessee during the relevant assessment year received a sum of Rs. 1,54,54,792 as share premium. The assessee submitted that the company had in the earlier assessment year issued shares to ACT Digital Home Enterprises Private Limited (ACT Digital) with a face value of Rs. 10 per share and a share premium of Rs. 912. It was stated that for 17042 shares, an amount of Rs. 4 per share was outstanding towards face value and Rs. 908 per share was outstanding towards share premium as on 01.04.2015. Accordingly, the assessee claimed total share capital and share premium received during the year amounted to Rs. 1,55,42,304 ca .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s of the share application as well as the method of valuation adopted by the assessee company. There is no valuation report submitted by the assessee. The assessee company has given all sorts of artificial figures on a plain paper to arrive at the value per share. Prima facie, it can be said that there was no valuation done by the assessee company for valuation of shares and the "determination of value of share" submitted during the course of assessment proceedings to arrive at the desired value per share appears to be an afterthought of the assessee. ............................ Under these circumstances, by invoking section 56(2)(viib) of the I.T.Act, 1961 the face value of Rs. 10/- is considered as genuine. The value of Rs. 922/- per .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ter explaining the need for introduction of section 56(2)(viib) of the I.T.Act and the amendment to section 68 of the I.T.Act by Finance Act, 2012, held that such amendment is to control bogus / unjustified subscription of share premium and to prevent circulation of black money. The CIT(A), after examining the valuation given by the assessee, held that it is not as per the prescribed method nor does it have any scientific basis. Accordingly, the CIT(A) confirmed the view of the Assessing Officer and held that the share premium is to be assessed u/s 56(2)(viib) of the I.T.Act. 5. Aggrieved, the assessee has raised this issue before the Tribunal. None was present on behalf of the assessee, though notice was served on the assessee several tim .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... value of the shares as the deemed fair market value and the share premium was assessed as income from other sources u/s 56(2)(viib) of the I.T.Act. The provisions of section 56(2)(viib) of the I.T.Act to be invoked, necessarily the FMV has to be established as per one of the prescribed methods. Therefore, in order to determine the fair market value of the shares, the matter is referred to the CIT(A). The CIT(A) shall call for a remand report from the AO, who shall determine the FMV of shares by following any of the prescribed methods. After confronting the remand report with assessee, the CIT(A) may take appropriate decision as per law. It is ordered accordingly. 8. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed. Order .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates