9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (7) TMI 1457X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , i.e., the date on which demonetization was announced, which sufficiently explains the source of deposit of Rs. 52,60,000/- in specified bank notes. Apart from this, the assessee had duly furnished the month wise details of sales, month wise details of purchase, corresponding freight charges incurred month wise, month wise power and fuel expenses and month wise selling expenses in the form of rebate and discount. The assessee also furnished the quantitative details of goods month wise for rice, sugar, chana dal and wheat flour before the ld. AO. All these facts clearly go to prove the genuineness claim made by the assessee that cash deposits of Rs. 52,60,000/- has been made out of cash balance available with the assessee and, hence, in our ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r of assessment passed u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) dated 27.12.2019 by the Assessing Officer, Circle-13(1), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO ). 2. The only effective issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the ld.CIT(A) was justified in confirming the addition made in the sum of Rs. 52,60,000/- u/s 68 of the Act r.w.s. 115BBE of the Act in respect of cash deposits made during demonetization period, in the facts and circumstances of the instant case. 3. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. The assessee is engaged in trading and processing of food grains. The assessee filed its original return of income on 12.07.2017 declaring tot ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ames and addresses of the debtors from whom the cash was received. In response, the assessee submitted confirmations from 12 parties out of total 1624 debto Rs. In respect of the remaining 1612 cases, neither any details of PAN nor complete addresses of the debtors were furnished. Accordingly, the ld. AO disbelieved the entire explanation given by the assessee and proceeded to make an addition of Rs. 52,60,000/- in respect of cash deposits made in specified bank notes during the demonetization period as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act r.w.s. 115BBE of the Act. 4. It is not in dispute that the assessee company is maintaining regular books of account which is duly subjected to statutory audit under the Companies Act and tax audit u/ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ointed out thereon by the ld. AO and the said books were not rejected by the ld. AO. The details of cash received from various debtors were duly furnished by the assessee comprising the name of the party, address, amount due, amounts received and balance due from the said party. These details are also enclosed in pages 154 to 193 of the paper book filed before us. It is a fact on record that the assessee had made total cash sales recovery of Rs. 15,43,49,743/- during the year and out of this, only a sum of Rs. 52.60 lakhs is disputed by the ld. AO. From the business model operated by the assessee, the assessee has been regularly making cash and credit sales to these customers. The customers pay the dues to the assessee only in cash and as s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the ld. AO after making minor disallowance of expenses of personal nature. We find that scrutiny assessment orders were framed u/s 143(3) of the Act on 31.03.2014, 29.02.2016 and 25.07.2016 for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15 respectively. Even the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) issued by the Department vide CBDT Instruction No.03/2017 dated 21.02.2017 in connection with the assessment of demonetization deposits clearly states that there should not be abnormal jump in cash sales and in the instant case cash is deposited within one or two days from the time of its receipt. At the cost of repetition, to the extent of sales made, the stock position is also correspondingly reduced by the assessee which goes to prove the genui ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o different bank accounts; there is sufficient stock available with the assessee; and there was no occasion to inflate the stocks by introducing fictitious purchases by the assessee; there was no transfer of deposited cash to another account or other entity which are not relevant for the assessee. Hence, even as per the SOP dated 21.02.2017 issued by the CBDT which is mandatorily to be followed by the Revenue authorities, no addition could be made in the instant case. 5. In view of the aforesaid observations, we hold that the addition made in the sum of Rs. 52,60,000/- in the instant case in the hands of the assessee is grossly unjustified and, hence, are hereby directed to be deleted. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee are all ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
