Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (9) TMI 372

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e conducted on 12.10.2023 by the Kolkata Circle. Only the Kolkata Office Circle had seized some incriminating materials, which were directly linking the involvement of the petitioner into the business of Lotteries, which was carried out within the jurisdiction of Kolkata Office Circle. Therefore, they have requested the Coimbatore Office Circle to transfer the cases to Kolkata. Thereafter, the show cause notice was issued and a reply was also filed. Taking into consideration of all these aspects, the Notification dated 17.05.2024 was issued. As all the materials have been collected in Kolkata Office, the respondents, taking into consideration of the reply filed by the petitioner, have decided to transfer the petitioners' case to Central Circle, Kolkata. Of course, in the present case, since the incriminating materials were found by the Kolkata Office against the petitioner, connected with the search conducted with regard to Lottery business, it was closely linked with the assessment of the petitioner. No material to show that the respondents failed either to provide an opportunity or sufficient materials to transfer the case from Coimbatore to Central Circle, Kolkata. Even if i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Petitioner submits that the impugned Notification was issued to transfer the petitioner's case to the Central Circle, Kolkata. He submits that in the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner is the resident of Coimbatore having a registered office at Coimbatore. Under this circumstance, the show cause notification was issued by the 1st respondent on 09.04.2024 stating a Search and Seizure action was carried out under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the petitioners' case on 12.10.2023 by Authorized Officer under the control of the Principal Director of Income Tax (Investigation), Kolkata, where they have seized number of incriminating documents and therefore, they have requested to transfer the case to the Central Circle at Kolkata. The present show cause notice was issued for the purpose of calling for reply. Subsequent to the said show cause notice, the petitioner had filed their reply on 13.04.2024. 3. The main grievance of the Petitioner is that their reply was not considered while issuing the Notification dated 17.05.2024. Further, no opportunity of personal hearing was provided. On 11.05.2024, the petitioner requested for personal hearing. However, the perso .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cause notice to the petitioner was issued on 09.04.2024. In the said show cause notice, the respondents have narrated the situation in which, they intend to transfer the petitioner's case to Kolkata. Further, he would submit that in the show cause notice, the petitioner was requested to file their reply/objections, within 15 days from the date of receipt of the Show Cause Notice. After taking into consideration the petitioners' reply, the Notification was issued on 17.05.2024 under Section 127 (2) of the Income Tax Act. Before issuing the Notification, all the contentions of the petitioner was considered by the respondents and accordingly, order came to be passed. Therefore, he would submit that since the reply of the petitioner was considered, there is no violation of principles of natural justice. He would submit that it is only the transfer of case and with regard to seizure of the incriminating documents, the petitioner is well aware and those documents affect the assessment of the petitioner. Further, in the show cause notice, other details are narrated. Therefore, taking into account the seriousness of the violation and the petitioner have been carrying on business an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... As documents have been seized at different places, it is necessary that all the cases should be considered together at one place so that harmonious and co-ordinated investigation be undertaken to arrive at just assessment. In view of the above, you are hereby being show caused as to why order u/s 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 should not be passed to centralize your case for effective and co-ordinated investigation in your case. Accordingly, you are granted an opportunity to convey your objection in writing, if any, within 15 (Fifteen) days from the date of receipt of this letter. 09. A perusal of the said show cause notice reflects that a search and seizure action was carried out under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, on 12.10.2023 by Authorized Officer under the control of the Principal Director of Income Tax (Investigation), Kolkata. As a result of the said search and seizure in Kolkata Office, the respondents found many incriminating documents and they have come to a conclusion that the petitioners were involved in this act. Therefore, it will directly affect the assessment of the petitioner. Under these circumstances, they have issued the show cause notice and in the said .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... olvement of the petitioner into the business of Lotteries, which was carried out within the jurisdiction of Kolkata Office Circle. Therefore, they have requested the Coimbatore Office Circle to transfer the cases to Kolkata. Thereafter, the show cause notice was issued and a reply was also filed. Taking into consideration of all these aspects, the Notification dated 17.05.2024 was issued. 13. As all the materials have been collected in Kolkata Office, the respondents, taking into consideration of the reply filed by the petitioner, have decided to transfer the petitioners' case to Central Circle, Kolkata. Of course, in the present case, since the incriminating materials were found by the Kolkata Office against the petitioner, connected with the search conducted with regard to Lottery business, it was closely linked with the assessment of the petitioner. 14. I do not find any material to show that the respondents failed either to provide an opportunity or sufficient materials to transfer the case from Coimbatore to Central Circle, Kolkata. Even if it is so, it will not alter in anyway the final decisions to transfer the cases to Calcutta Circle and it would not affect in any mann .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates