9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (9) TMI 513X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... with the conditions imposed under Section 129(e) of Customs Act, 1962 - HELD THAT:- The first issue to be addressed is the maintainability of these writ petitions challenging a final order of the CEGAT in the face of an alternate statutory remedy by way of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act. However, we take succour from a decision of this Court in the case of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... period of four (4) weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this order. Petition allowed. - Honourable Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth And Honourable Mr. Justice G.Arul Murugan For the Petitioner : Mr.Vishun Mohan for Mr.Rahul Balaji For the Respondents : Mr.H.Siddharth (for R2) Junior Standing Counsel, R1 - Tribunal COMMON ORDER DR. ANITA SUMANTH, J. In these writ petitions, the petitioners challenge ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dated 20.03.2023 reducing the amounts to Rs. 5 lakhs per appeal. Since the reduced amounts were also not deposited, the appeals came to be rejected for non-compliance with the stay conditions, by order dated 23.05.2003. Hence these writ petitions challenging order dated 23.05.2003. 4. The first issue to be addressed is the maintainability of these writ petitions challenging a final order of the CE ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g Counsel appearing for R2 has no serious objection to the restoration of the appeals before the CEGAT conditional upon the petitioners making the pre-deposit now. 6. Fortified by the aforesaid decision, and with a view to balancing the interests of the parties, we accept the plea of the petitioners and set aside impugned orders dated 21.05.2003 upon condition that the petitioners remit a sum of R ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
