9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (8) TMI 1732X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Per P K Bansal, Vice-President: These cross appeals have been filed against the order of the CIT(A)-55, Mumbai, dated 15.06.1015, for assessment year 2005-06. 2. At the outset, the assessee did not press for the appeal filed by him and requested for withdrawal of appeal. The learned DR did not object to the same. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee as withdrawn. 3. Now comin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... was bad in law as the company had liquidated on 11.03.2009, while the notice u/s. 148, on the basis of which assessment has been framed by the Assessing Officer was issued on 29.03.2012, at the address of Loop Mobile Holdings India Ltd. The CIT(A) relying on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. vs. CIT 186 ITR 278, quashed the assessment ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... vs. ACIT (2007) (15 SOT 331) (Kol ITAT) * Silicon Graphics System (I) Ltd., v. Department Of Income Tax (ITA.No. 571 to 576/Del/2012 * Spice Entertainment Ltd (ITA No. 475 of 2011) (Delhi HC) * CIT vs. Kurban Hussain Ibrahimji Mithiborwala, (1971) 82 ITR 821 (SC) * SPN Milk Product Industries (P) Ltd (ITA No. 565/Del/2O12) (Delhi ITAT) No contrary decision was brought to our knowledge by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
