9911796707
TMI Blog2003 (5) TMI 540X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... appellant and Dr. Shamsuddin, DLA for the respondent. This is an appeal against the order of 19-9-2000 passed by the Asstt. Director of Enforcement whereby the appellant has been ordered to pay penalty of Rs. 10,000 for contravention of section 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d) of FERA, 1973 and further Rs. 5 lakhs seized from the premises of the appellant has been ordered to be confiscated. 2. Shri Mahendra S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... any person by name Hyder Ali. I state that the statement recorded by your Officers on 23-6-1999 is not voluntary. I retract from the same. I pray for release of my money i.e. Rs. 5 lakhs at the earliest. Thanking you, Yours faithfully, Sd/- (Mohan Lal) 3. In the first statement the appellant gave detailed version of his activities which is accepted were sufficient to bring home the charges. Learn ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... inculpates not only himself but also another person that such evidence is admissible. I am, therefore, satisfied that the order holding the appellant guilty of contravention is not invalid. Penalty of Rs. 10,000 is not very severe but confiscation of entire amount of Rs. 5 lakhs cannot be justified under section 63. 4. It is not mandatory to confiscate the entire amount involved in the contraventi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
