9911796707
TMI Blog2001 (6) TMI 842X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -10-1999 imposing a penalty of Rs. 1,50,000 on the appellant for contravening the provisions of section 8(1)/(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. 2. The appellant has sent a letter dated 11-6-2001 requesting an ad interim stay and hearing at Hyderabad only as he is unable to bear the expenses to come out in Delhi for hearing of the case on account of his financial problems. Shri Gadoo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... m Niwas (Ex.D-II). Para 3 of this letter reads as in this regard it is submitted that the party received adjudication order way back in November, 1999 but in response to the NNP stated that he has not received adjudication order. In response, this office while clarifying that he received the adjudication order, supplied a copy of the same to him vide letter dated 13-3-2000. However, he failed to d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed above. In this petition the appellant has stated that he shifted from Hyderabad to Bangalore in 1999 and was visiting Hyderabad once in a month to see the members of his family. He has referred to the show-cause notice for non deposit served upon him by the respondents and stated that the appellant could realise the penalty order which was left in Hyderabad without attending the same immediatel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... days. On a careful consideration of the written submissions made by the appellant as well as the oral submissions made by the respondents, especially having regard to the Ex. D-I and D-II filed by the respondents, I do not find any sufficient cause for not filing this appeal by the appellant in time. The delay is inordinate ex facie on the face of it and there is no reason why the appellant could ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
