9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (1) TMI 1326X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the properties except the two properties specifically mentioned in the said order. There were certain observations in the order made by this Tribunal. The issue of impugned notices dated 12-1-2021 does not violate the order of this Tribunal, therefore, the applications have no merit and accordingly dismissed. - G.C. MISHRA, ACTING CHAIRMAN For the Appellant : Hemendra Singh Kashyap and Mrs. Parul Dagar, Advs. For the Respondent : Mohammad Faraz, Adv. ORDER 1. The matters are taken up through video conferencing. The appearances of the learned counsels are as above. MP-PMLA-8094/SML/2021 (U.A.), MP-PMLA-8096/SML/2021 (U.A.), MP-PMLA-8098/SML/2021 (U.A.) MP-PMLA-8100/SML/2021 (U.A.) 2. In view of the eviction notices dated 12-1-2021 the appe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t (ED) has violated the order of this Tribunal passed on dated 14-12-2020 and further submitted that this Hon'ble Tribunal please to pass an order of status quo and in spite of the same, the respondent (ED) has issued notices to hand over the possession of the two properties clearly mentioned in the previous order. It is further submitted that the status quo order is till the next date of hearing, so the respondent (ED) could not have issued the notices dated 12-1-2021. 7. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent (ED) submitted that there is no violation of the order and the respondent (ED) has issued the notices dated 12-1-2021 which are in the line of the order passed by this Tribunal on 14-12-2020, so the application ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t and as per the following provisions the said premises are required to be handed over by the tenants. During the course of hearing, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent (ED) that the tenants have assured to vacate the premises shortly and, to hand over the possession of the same, and this submission was not controverted by the learned counsel for the appellants. The respondent (ED) may take the possession of above mentioned two properties as per the rule 5(4) of the manner of taking possession of immovable property under the provisions of the Prevention of Money-laundering (Taking Possession of Attached or Frozen Properties Confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2013 ('the Rules'), which is quoted bel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
