TMI Blog2024 (10) TMI 1008X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... erits - HELD THAT:- On perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the tax proposal was confirmed because the petitioner did not reply to the show cause notice. The petitioner asserts that such non-participation was on account of not being aware of proceedings. In these facts and circumstances, the interest of justice warrants reconsideration by putting the petitioner on terms. The impugned ord ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cal service or any other mode. On account of not being aware of the proceedings, it is stated that the petitioner could not participate in the same. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be in a position to provide an explanation with regard to the confirmed tax proposal, if provided an opportunity. On instructions, he submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Within the said period, the petitioner is permitted to submit a reply to the show cause notice. Upon receipt of the petitioner's reply and on being satisfied that 10% of the disputed tax demand was received, the first respondent is directed to provide a reasonable opportunit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|