Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court held that the reopening notice issued u/s 148 ...


Notice to Non-Existent Entity Invalid: Court Rules Against Tax Notice Post-Amalgamation, Upholds Legal Principle.

October 21, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

The High Court held that the reopening notice issued u/s 148 against a non-existent entity, i.e., the amalgamating company that had ceased to exist due to an approved scheme of amalgamation, was invalid and illegal. Despite being informed about the amalgamation, the Assessing Officer issued the jurisdictional notice solely in the name of the amalgamating company, which was fundamentally at odds with the legal principle that the amalgamating entity ceases to exist upon the approved scheme of amalgamation. The appellant's participation in the proceedings cannot operate as an estoppel against law. The Assessing Officer lacked legal basis and jurisdiction to issue the impugned notice u/s 148A(b), pass an order thereon, and further issue the impugned notice u/s 148 to a non-existing entity. Such notices were illegal, invalid, and non-est from the outset. The decision was in favor of the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Reopening of assessment post amalgamation process - Mere activation of PAN number may not give a right to the revenue to issue notice to a non-existent entity....

  2. Validity of reopening of assessment - notice against non existent entity / amalgamated company - Notices issued.

  3. Reassessment proceedings against non existent entity - amalgamated company - Mere activation of PAN number may not give a right to the respondents to issue notice to a...

  4. The High Court addressed the validity of a show cause notice (SCN) and final order issued against a non-existent entity, the rectification of procedural defects, and the...

  5. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 against non-existing entity - scheme of the amalgamation and arrangement approved - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's argument...

  6. Validity of Order passed against a non-existent entity - The Appellate Tribunal's decision revolves around the critical legal principle that an assessment order issued...

  7. Validity of assessment against non existent company - amalgamation proceedings concluded - the assessment order passed on a non-existent Company is bad in law, inasmuch...

  8. The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated against the non-existent amalgamating company. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Maruti Suzuki...

  9. Reassessment proceedings issued in the name of a non-existent entity - amalgamation of a company - The stand of the revenue that the reassessment was justified in view...

  10. Respondent M/s Vedanta Limited [Vedanta] is the resultant entity after M/s Cairn India Limited [Cairn] amalgamated with it. The TPO and AO inadvertently made the draft...

  11. Notice u/s 148 issued to a non-existent entity due to merger. ITAT held such notice illegal, invalid and non-est as per Bombay HC in Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. Despite...

  12. Notices/endorsement in Form GST DRC-01 issued to a non-existent entity set aside. Proceedings initiated through show cause notices/endorsement quashed. Respondents at...

  13. The revenue authorities were aware of the amalgamation of AOK In-house Factoring Services Private Limited with 3i Infotech BPO Limited. The assessing officer passed the...

  14. HC held assessment orders passed in name of amalgamating companies void ab initio, despite participation of amalgamated company (RIL) in proceedings. Revenue authorities...

  15. Reassessment notices issued to a non-existing entity - Amalgamation - The fact that PAN was not deactivated would not help the Revenue because there could be cases...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates