Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court held that the reopening notice issued u/s 148 ...


Reopening notice against non-existent amalgamating company invalid, despite assessee's participation - merger extinguishes entity.

Case Laws     Income Tax

October 21, 2024

The High Court held that the reopening notice issued u/s 148 against a non-existent entity, i.e., the amalgamating company that had ceased to exist due to an approved scheme of amalgamation, was invalid and illegal. Despite being informed about the amalgamation, the Assessing Officer issued the jurisdictional notice solely in the name of the amalgamating company, which was fundamentally at odds with the legal principle that the amalgamating entity ceases to exist upon the approved scheme of amalgamation. The appellant's participation in the proceedings cannot operate as an estoppel against law. The Assessing Officer lacked legal basis and jurisdiction to issue the impugned notice u/s 148A(b), pass an order thereon, and further issue the impugned notice u/s 148 to a non-existing entity. Such notices were illegal, invalid, and non-est from the outset. The decision was in favor of the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Validity of reopening of assessment - notice against non existent entity / amalgamated company - Notices issued.

  2. Assessment against a company which was non-existent is invalid - AT

  3. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice in the name of a non-existing company - company as already been amalgamated - Thus impugned notice was issued in the name of...

  4. Notice u/s 148 – Notice was issued in the name of amalgamating company which has been merged - the amalgamating company ceased to exist - Notice invalid - AT

  5. Assessment against amalgamating company - notice u/s 143(2) was issued to non-existent company - Participation in the proceedings by the appellant in the circumstances...

  6. Reopening of assessment post amalgamation process - Mere activation of PAN number may not give a right to the revenue to issue notice to a non-existent entity....

  7. Reassessment proceedings against non existent entity - amalgamated company - Mere activation of PAN number may not give a right to the respondents to issue notice to a...

  8. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice against non-existing company - notice was issued in the name of the amalgamating company - The substantive defective notice...

  9. The case pertains to the validity of an assessment order against a company that had already undergone amalgamation. The key points are: The assessment order was passed...

  10. Validity of TP Adjustment against non existent entity - amalgamated company - all the revenue authorities i.e., the AO, TPO and DRP have passed the order in the name of...

  11. The revenue authorities were aware of the amalgamation of AOK In-house Factoring Services Private Limited with 3i Infotech BPO Limited. The assessing officer passed the...

  12. Assessment order passed on an non- existent entity - Fact of amalgamation was not disclosed in the business/organization column and the assessment order indicated the...

  13. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice u/s 148 issued on non-existent entity as the assessee was dissolved - the name of assessee was struck off from the Registrar of...

  14. Notice against company non existing - The Principal Chief Commissioner is directed to hold an enquiry against the concerned officers as to why despite being brought to...

  15. Validity of assessment order - Amalgamation - transfer pricing order u/s. 92CA(3) was passed against non-est (amalgamated) company - assessment order though passed in...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates