9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (10) TMI 1331X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the Respondent : J.N Venkata Suresh Kumar JUDGMENT: PER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. NARENDAR 1. Heard the learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the appellants and learned counsel for the Respondent/Writ Petitioner. 2. The intra-Court appeal is preferred assailing the order of the learned Single Judge, whereby the learned Single Judge quashed the disciplinary proceedings midway, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... resulting in no cause of action to canvass or maintain the Writ Petition. The mere pendency of the inquiry or the Writ Petitioner's apprehension of any adverse orders cannot be a ground to maintain the Writ Petition. It is apparent that no rights of the Writ Petitioner have been abridged, nor has the inquiry resulted in altering the service conditions. In that context, the mere issuance of the sho ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g of the claim or consideration of the pending tax revision cases. He further contends that the charge itself could not have been framed in the absence of sufficient material. Additionally, he argues that there has been a gross miscarriage of justice, as neither the inquiry officer nor the presiding officer furnished the documents sought by him. 6. In our considered opinion, these are grounds of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y the impugned order. In our opinion, the Writ Petition itself was premature in the absence of any adverse impact on the rights or service conditions of the Writ Petitioner. 8. In that view of the matter, we have no hesitation in allowing the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed in part. The impugned order is set aside, and the matter is remitted back to the disciplinary/competent authority ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
