9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (10) TMI 1507X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... were uploaded on the portal without being served on the petitioner through any other mode - violation of principles of natural justice - petitioner agrees that the petitioner would remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand - HELD THAT:- The documents on record indicate that the assessment orders were preceded by an intimation and a show cause notice. The assessment orders also ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... spect of each assessment period with in a maximum period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order - Petition disposed off. - THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY For the Petitioner: Ms. Clintly Johny for Mr.Rupesh Sharma For the Respondent: Mr. V.Prashanth Kiran, GA (T) COMMON ORDER The petitioner assails an assessment order dated 18.01.2024 in respect of two ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d multiple opportunities to contest the tax demand. He also points out that about three opportunities for a personal hearing were offered to the petitioner. Learned Government Advocate further submits that the petitioner has a statutory remedy and should be directed to avail of such statutory remedy. In the event of interference, he submits that the petitioner should be put on terms. 4. On instruc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the purpose of providing an opportunity to the petitioner, the impugned assessment orders are interfered with albeit by putting the petitioner on terms. 6. For reasons set out above, the impugned assessment orders are quashed subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand in respect of each assessment period with in a maximum period of three weeks from the date ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
