Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2010 (10) TMI 1258

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... veneers and allied products. The fourth respondent-company availed financial assistance from the first respondent-bank by mortgaging its assets, including the factory building and land appurtenant thereto, having an extent of 4.5 acres. It is stated that the directors of the company are co-obligants in the loan transaction and properties belonging to them were also mortgaged for securing financial assistance. Consequent to default committed by the fourth respondent in repayment, respondents Nos. 1 and 2 initiated proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short "the SARFAESI Act") and the assets of the fourth respondent-company, including the fac .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ny. 3. The petitioners are total strangers, as far as the loan transaction is concerned. The loan in question was availed by the fourth respondent-company and its directors. The loan is secured through mortgage of various assets of the company and the directors. Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 are now proceeding against those secured assets by resorting to provisions under the SARFAESI Act. The petitioners are now raising claims based on amounts allegedly due to them from the fourth respondent. Admittedly, the alleged dues are not adjudicated or quantified by any competent authority empowered under the relevant labour legislations. Even assuming that there is any amount due to the petitioners from the fourth respondent, which stands adjudicated a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 's dues. In the subsequent proviso it is mentioned that, in such case the liquidator should intimate the secured creditors about the workmen's dues, for the above said purpose. Section 529A of the Companies Act, 1956, deals with distribution of assets and its priorities in case of companies which are ordered to be wound up. The said provision prescribes priority with respect to workmen's dues. 5. In the case at hand, neither the fourth respondent-company has been wound up nor any proceedings has been initiated for winding up of the said company. Therefore it is evident that none of the provisos to section 13(9) is applicable in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners had placed reliance on the decision of the apex court .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oke appellate remedies available under section 17(1) of the said Act and this writ petition cannot be entertained in any manner. He further points out that in paragraph 54 of the judgment in Allahabad Bank's case (supra), it is clearly mentioned that if a company, which is implicated as a defendant in a proceedings under the RDBFI Act, against which no order of winding up has been issued, is only like any other defendant, and if in such case any question arises before the Tribunal with respect to priority in distribution of any amount realised, the Tribunal need to decide such questions bearing in mind only the principles underlying in section 73 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It is observed that section 22 of the RDBFI Act confe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e prayer in the writ petition to quash the proceedings in D. R. C. No. 115 of 2010 of the Debts Recovery Tribunal-2, Chennai could not be allowed. So also this court will not be justified in directing the respondents to effect payment of any sum to the petitioners as workmen's dues, out of amounts if any recovered in proceedings initiated against the secured assets under the SARFAESI Act. Therefore the writ petition deserves no merit and the same is accordingly dismissed. 8. However, it is made clear that on the event of the fourth respondent-company being wound up or any proceedings for winding up being initiated against the company, the petitioners will be at liberty to seek appropriate reliefs in accordance with the provisions of th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates