Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (11) TMI 987

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s time bound wherein, the closure date was prescribed of31.12.2014. By amendment in the said notification, the appellant s goods i.e. falling under85441190was excluded by Notification dated 11.07.2014. Since, the notification otherwise prescribed the time limit upto31.12.2014,the appellant had bonafide belief that 10% rate is effective till 31.12.2014. It is only because of the appellant was not aware of the notification, they continued to pay the duty at the rate of 10%. Appellant s bonafide further get reinforced on the ground that the appellant have been declaring the goods with Chapter heading and the rate of duty, at the rate of 10% in their all ER-1 monthly return for the period July, 14 to December,14. The changes were brought by sta .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... bility regularly. By the Notification No. 12/2012 CE dated 17.03.2012, concessional rates of duty for different goods were prescribed. 1.1 Vide Notification No. 04/2014 dated 17.2.2014, Sr. No. 346 was inserted in the above referred Notification No. 12/2012-CE and the concessional rate of duty @10% was prescribed for the goods falling under Chapter 85 (other than falling under CETH 854810) w.e.f. 17.02.2014. The effect of the said Sr. No. 346 was applicable up to 31st December 2014 (in terms of the Notification No. 6/2014-CE dated 25-6-2014). 1.2 In view of the above Sr. No. 346, the appellant was paying C. Ex. duty @10% while removal of the goods viz; PC Copper Strip/Wire falling under CETH 85441190 for home consumption as well as for Expo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e removed for home clearance for exports under claim of rebate @10.30% instead of @12.36% during the period from July 2014 to December 2014. In view of the above, it was concluded by the audit party that the assessee had cleared goods falling under CETH 85441190 valued Rs. 47,37,48,994/- @10.30% instead of 12.36% during the period July to December 2014 which resulted in short payment of C. Ex. duty Rs. 97,59,229/-. The said audit objection was communicated vide letter dated 15.05.2017. In response to the same, the appellant had submitted the reply dated 22-05-2017. 1.5 In terms of the said observation, the SCN dated 18.10.2017 was issued proposing to demand C. Ex. duty Rs. 97,59,229/- for the period July to December 2014; to recover interes .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t. Therefore there was no suppression of fact on the part of the appellant. Hence, the entire demand for the period July, 2014 to December, 2014 by show cause notice dated 18.10.2017 invoking extended period is clearly time barred. He placed reliance on the following judgments:- V.E. Commercial Vehicles Ltd., Man Trucks India Pvt. Ltd, V/s CCE-2018 (3) TMI 256-CESTAT-New Delhi CCE V/s V.E. Commercial Vehicles Ltd -2019 (9) TMI 887-SC Sanghi Industries Ltd. V/s CCE-2014 (302) ELT 459 (Tri.-Ahmd) Accurate Chemicals Industries V/s CCE- 2014 (300) ELT 451(Tri-Del) CCE V/s Accurate Chemical Industries- 2014 (310) ELT 441 (All) Birla Corporation Ltd. V/s CCE- (2023) 11 Centax 132 (Tri.-Del) CCE V/s Birla Corporation Ltd.- (2023) 11 Centax 133 (S. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s effective till 31.12.2014. It is only because of the appellant was not aware of the notification, they continued to pay the duty at the rate of 10%. Appellant s bonafide further get reinforced on the ground that the appellant have been declaring the goods with Chapter heading and the rate of duty, at the rate of 10% in their all ER-1 monthly return for the period July, 14 to December,14. The changes were brought by statutory amendment which is otherwise known to the department also. The department was also aware that the appellant prior to 11.07.2014 had been paying the duty at the rate of 10%. Therefore, immediately when the amendment notification was issued on 11.07.2014, the department could have immediately approached the assessee for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates