2007 (5) TMI 697

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... jee Co.. For the Respondents : Mr. Krishna Kumar with Mr. Pritosh Jaiswal i/b. Vishal Khanavkar Kedar Dighe. ORDER P.C. : The Appeal before this Court under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 arises out of an interlocutory order dated 6th June 2005 passed by the Company Law Board (CLB) in C.A.21 of 2005. The Appeal was admitted on 19th August 2005 and at the stage of admission parties had agre .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er upon the correctness of the interlocutory order passed by the CLB, it would be appropriate if, by consent, the impugned order dated 6th June 2005 is set aside without the expression of any final opinion by this Court on the merits of the rival contentions between the parties. The approach adopted by both the parties through their Counsel is fair and would commend itself for acceptance. It is in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... xigencies of its own work preferably within a period of four months of the date of the commencement of the final hearing. 3. In so far as the issue of inspection is concerned, it is clarified by consent that all the rights and contentions of the parties are kept open, to be urged before the CLB, including the submission urged on behalf of the Seventh Respondent that an adverse inference should be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X