9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (12) TMI 925X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ght to be made by counsel for the petitioner regarding non-supply of documents, cannot be countenanced in the circumstances of the present case wherein neither in response to the notice pointing out the discrepancies nor in response to the notice under Section 73(1), the petitioner sought supply of the documents and based on the material available with it, filed the response. The adjudicating auth ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mar Yadav, Vijay Maurya For the Respondent : C.S.C., Manoj Kumar Kushwaha ORDER 1. This writ petition is directed against the show cause notice dated 30.05.2024 and the order dated 27.08.2024 passed by respondent no.2, whereby a demand to the tune of Rs.7,41,218/- has been created against the petitioner. 2. The petitioner was issued a show cause notice dated 06.04.2024 intimating discrepancies in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and raising a demand to the tune of Rs.7,41,218/-. Feeling aggrieved, the present petition has been filed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, with the aid of judgment in Shantanu Prakash Vs. State Bank of India Ors. : Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1730 of 2024 , decided on 22.05.2024 by Delhi High Court, made submissions that along with the show cause notice issued on 30.05.2024, it was required o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sel for the parties and have perused the material available on record. 7. The submissions sought to be made by counsel for the petitioner regarding non-supply of documents, cannot be countenanced in the circumstances of the present case wherein neither in response to the notice pointing out the discrepancies nor in response to the notice under Section 73(1), the petitioner sought supply of the doc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
