9911796707
TMI BlogNotification extending time limit not applicable for passing of order under Section 73 for FY 2017-18X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Notification extending time limit not applicable for passing of order under Section 73 for FY 2017-18 - By: - CA Bimal Jain - Goods and Services Tax - GST - Dated:- 24-12-2024 - The Hon ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/S A.V. PHARMA THRU. ITS PROP. SMT. MADHU VOHRA VERSUS STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. STATE TAX LKO. AND 2 OTHERS - 2024 (11) TMI 911 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT allowed the wr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... it petition and quashed the order issued by the Department for FY 2017-2018 stating that the orders have been issued beyond the prescribed time limit thereby holding that as the time limit for passing of order under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ( the CGST Act ) for the Impugned Period i.e. February 05, 2023 has expired prior to the date of notification coming into eff ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ect i.e. March 31, 2023, thus, the Notification extending the time limit for passing of Impugned Order under Section 79 would not be applicable. Facts: M/s. AV Pharma ( the Petitioner ) through its Proprietor, filed a writ petition for setting aside of order dated October 05, 2024 issued in Form GST DRC-13 and December 02, 2023 issued in Form GST DRC-07 ( the Impugned Orders ) for the period of FY ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2017-2018 ( the Impugned Period ) on the ground that the Impugned Orders passed are barred by sub-section (10) of Section 73 of the CGST Act, as the said Impugned Orders have been passed beyond the prescribed time limit, i.e. three years from the due date of filing of annual return, ending on February 05, 2023. Issue: Whether Notification extending time limit would be applicable for passing of or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der under Section 73 for FY 2017-2018? Held: The Hon ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/S A.V. PHARMA THRU. ITS PROP. SMT. MADHU VOHRA VERSUS STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. STATE TAX LKO. AND 2 OTHERS - 2024 (11) TMI 911 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT held as under: Noted that, for the justification of time limit, reliance was placed upon State Notification No. 515/XI-2-23-9(47)/17-T.C.215-U.P.Act ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -1-2017-Order-(273)-2023 dated April 24, 2023 ( the Notification ), which has been given retrospective effect only w.e.f. March 31, 2023 which has been adopted from notification issued by Central Government bearing Notification No. 09/2023 Central Tax dated March 31, 2023 , thereby extending the time limit for passing of order under Section 73 for the Impugned Period till December 31, 2023. Furthe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r Noted that, as the time limit for passing of order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for the Impugned Period i.e. February 05, 2023 has expired prior to the date of notification coming into effect i.e. March 31, 2023, the Notification extending the time limit for passing of Impugned Order under Section 79 would not be applicable. Further Opined that, the Impugned Orders are beyond the prescribed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... time lime under Section 73(10) of the CGST Act , as applicable during the Impugned Period. Held that, the Impugned Orders are quashed and the writ petition is allowed. (Author can be reached at [email protected] ) - Scholarly articles for knowledge sharing authors experts professionals Tax Management India - taxmanagementindia - taxmanagement - taxmanagementindia.com - TMI - TaxTMI - TMITax ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
