Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Article Section

Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST CA Bimal Jain Experts This

Notification extending time limit not applicable for passing of order under Section 73 for FY 2017-18

Submit New Article

Discuss this article

Notification extending time limit not applicable for passing of order under Section 73 for FY 2017-18
CA Bimal Jain By: CA Bimal Jain
December 24, 2024
All Articles by: CA Bimal Jain       View Profile
  • Contents

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/S A.V. PHARMA THRU. ITS PROP. SMT. MADHU VOHRA VERSUS STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. STATE TAX LKO. AND 2 OTHERS - 2024 (11) TMI 911 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT allowed the writ petition and quashed the order issued by the Department for FY 2017-2018 stating that the orders have been issued beyond the prescribed time limit thereby holding that as the time limit for passing of order under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) for the Impugned Period i.e. February 05, 2023 has expired prior to the date of notification coming into effect i.e. March 31, 2023, thus, the Notification extending the time limit for passing of Impugned Order under Section 79 would not be applicable.

Facts:

M/s. AV Pharma (“the Petitioner”) through its Proprietor, filed a writ petition for setting aside of order dated October 05, 2024 issued in Form GST DRC-13 and December 02, 2023 issued in Form GST DRC-07 (“the Impugned Orders”) for the period of FY 2017-2018 (“the Impugned Period”) on the ground that the Impugned Orders passed are barred by sub-section (10) of Section 73 of the CGST Act, as the said Impugned Orders have been passed beyond the prescribed time limit, i.e. three years from the due date of filing of annual return, ending on February 05, 2023.

Issue:

Whether Notification extending time limit would be applicable for passing of order under Section 73 for FY 2017-2018?

Held:

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/S A.V. PHARMA THRU. ITS PROP. SMT. MADHU VOHRA VERSUS STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. STATE TAX LKO. AND 2 OTHERS - 2024 (11) TMI 911 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT held as under:

  • Noted that, for the justification of time limit, reliance was placed upon State Notification No. 515/XI-2-23-9(47)/17-T.C.215-U.P.Act-1-2017-Order-(273)-2023 dated April 24, 2023 (“the Notification”), which has been given retrospective effect only w.e.f. March 31, 2023 which has been adopted from notification issued by Central Government bearing Notification No. 09/2023 – Central Tax dated March 31, 2023, thereby extending the time limit for passing of order under Section 73 for the Impugned Period till December 31, 2023.
  • Further Noted that, as the time limit for passing of order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for the Impugned Period i.e. February 05, 2023 has expired prior to the date of notification coming into effect i.e. March 31, 2023, the Notification extending the time limit for passing of Impugned Order under Section 79 would not be applicable.
  • Further Opined that, the Impugned Orders are beyond the prescribed time lime under Section 73(10) of the CGST Act, as applicable during the Impugned Period.
  • Held that, the Impugned Orders are quashed and the writ petition is allowed.

 (Author can be reached at [email protected])

 

By: CA Bimal Jain - December 24, 2024

 

 

Discuss this article

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates