Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (12) TMI 1490

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... In the Show Cause Notice dated 13.12.2023, the respondents have clearly stated that date of personal hearing, time of personal hearing and venue for personal hearing would be inapplicable, which is sufficient to come to conclusion that no personal hearing was granted to the petitioner before passing adjudication order. Further, the aforesaid Show Cause Notice dated 13.12.2023 was not received by the petitioner as can be seen from the material on record including the impugned order, which merely states that the said Show Cause Notice was issued to the petitioner through BOWEB and not to the registered e-mail ID of the petitioner or physically to the petitioner. Thus, non serving of the Show Cause Notice upon the petitioner and non-providing/ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 1A bearing reference no. ZD291223006984A issued by the Respondent No. 1 and enclosed as Annexure B1. b. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ quashing the show cause notice u/s 73(1) dated 13/12/2023 bearing No. DCCT(IA I)/Mys./T.No./202324 along with the summary form DRC 01 bearing reference no. ZD2912230322070 issued by the Respondent No. 1 and enclosed as Annexure B2. c. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ quashing the adjudication order u/s 73(9) dated 28/12/2023 bearing No. DCCT(IA I)/Mys./T.No./202324 along with the summary form DRC 07 bearing reference no. ZD291223089082D issued by the Respondent No. 1 and enclosed as Annexure B3. d. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ quashing the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... has illegally proceeded to recover the amount from the petitioner even before the expiry of three months as mentioned in the notice as contemplated under Section 78 of the KGST Act and consequently, the impugned adjudication order deserves to be set aside and the amount recovered from the petitioner by the respondent deserves to be refunded to the petitioner by remitting the matter back to the respondent for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law. 4. Per contra, learned AGA supports the impugned order and submits that respondents under the proviso to Section 78 were entitled to reduce the period from three months to earlier period, which would enable the respondent to recover determined amount from the petitioner and as such, the pe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... inion that non serving of the Show Cause Notice upon the petitioner and non-providing/non-granting of personal hearing and passing the impugned adjudication order, is violative of principle of natural justice warranting interference of this Court and consequently, the impugned adjudication order deserves to be quashed and the matter is remitted back to the respondent for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law. 8. Insofar as the contention urged by the petitioner that the adjudication order was served upon the petitioner along with the notice under Section 78 of the KGST Act calling upon the petitioner to pay the determined amount on or before 27.03.2024 i.e., within a period of three months, respondent could not have recovered the am .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... be clearly inapplicable especially when no reasons have been assigned by the respondent in the notice accompanying the adjudication order. Under these circumstances, the proviso could not have been invoked by the respondent and consequently, the necessary directions are to be issued to the respondent to refund the amount recovered from them. 11. In the result, I pass the following: ORDER i) Petition is hereby allowed. ii) Impugned adjudication order at Annexure-B3 under Section 73 dated 28.12.2023 issued by respondent No.1 is quashed. iii) The matter is remitted back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law. iv) Respondent No.1 shall provide sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and hear him and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates