9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (1) TMI 13X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ? - HELD THAT:- What has been issued to the respondent is merely a summons. Simply because he has been discharged in the predicate offence, a Court cannot quash the summons. The questions as to whether the respondent would be arrayed as an accused or not, is a matter which has to be decided at a later stage. In that eventuality, it is well open to the respondent to raise all relevant contentions f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... v For the Respondent : Mr. Siddhartha Borgohain, Adv. Ms. Farhat Jahan Rehmani, AOR Mr. Faizan Khan, Adv. Mr. Monis Faridi , Adv ORDER Leave granted. The only issue for consideration is as to whether the High Court is justified in quashing the summons on the premise that the respondent has been discharged in the predicate offence. We also note that the said order was passed by taking into consider ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aw. Suffice it is to state that at this stage we are dealing with a summons that has been issued. In such view of the matter, the impugned order stands set aside and the appellant is at liberty to proceed in pursuance to the summons that had been issued. However, we make it clear that all issues are left open to the respondent, in the event of him being arrayed as an accused. Considering the facts ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
