Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2025 (1) TMI 746

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... signed documents like Commercial Invoice, Bill of Lading, Certificate of Weight, Certificate of Quality, High Sea Sale agreement and other particulars like 'demurrage charges' paid. Hence, the Bills of Entry were 'provisionally assessed' under Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962 pending submission of the desired documents. 3. The appellant had executed Provisional Duty Bonds (PD Bonds) in terms of Regulation 3 of the Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations, 2011, which were accepted by the then Assistant/ Deputy Commissioner of Customs, while allowing for 'provisional assessment'. The appellant, in the said PD Bonds, had undertaken to submit all the desired documents within one month. 4. However, the appella .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ficiency, if any, between the duty finally assessed or reassessed, as the case may be, and the duty provisionally assessed." 5.1 It is observed in the above Order-in-Original that the appellant had executed Provisional Duty (PD Bonds) Bonds in terms of Regulation 3 of the Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations, 2011, which were accepted by the then Assistant/ Deputy Commissioner of Customs, while allowing for 'provisional assessment"; the appellant in the said PD Bonds had undertaken to submit all the desired documents within one month. On the ground that the appellant had not submitted the requisite documents within the prescribed time period of one month, the ld. adjudicating authority has taken the view that the appellant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nalized and 20 nos. of Bill of Entry are yet to be finalized. The purpose of imposition of penalty should be to get the provisional assessment finalized for delay in submission of documents. However, even now, 8 cases have not been finalized. Imposition of mere Rs.15,000/- penalty for 20 cases is meagre. It is the contention of the appellant Department that maximum penalty @ Rs.50,000 X 20 = Rs.10,00,000/- should have been imposed. I am in agreement with the view of the Department" 7. Aggrieved by the above order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), the appellant has filed the present appeal. 8. None appeared on behalf of the appellant. However, they have submitted a written submission wherein the appellant has requested to finalize the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (3) and 5 of the above Regulation, it is evident that penalty is liable to be attracted for non-submission of documents / information to the proper officer within one month of the date of execution of the bond, and such penalty "may extend to Rs.50,000/-". Therefore, the quantum of penalty is a matter of discretion of the proper officer and obviously it is not mandatory to impose the maximum penalty of the Rs.50,000/- in each case of default by the importer/exporter. (iii) In view of the above, the contention of the Respondent that maximum penalty ought to have been imposed on the Appellant in all the 8 cases which were pending finalization, is contrary to statute and has to be rejected by this Hon'ble Bench and the Appellant's ap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Entry involved, 27 could be finalised even before passing of the adjudication order. Keeping all this in view, the adjudicating authority took a fair decision and imposed a nominal penalty of Rs. 20,000/- which comes to Rs. 2,500/- for each of the remaining 8 Bills of Entry yet to be finalised for want of all the documents. This amount has already been paid by the appellant. The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) does not establish any ground for enhancing the penalty to the maximum of Rs. 50,000/- per Bill of Entry yet to be finalised." 12.1 .In the case of Essar Oil Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (Prev.), Jamnagar [2015 (329) E.L.T. 401 (Tri. - Ahd.)], it was held by the Tribunal that when there is some delay in furnishing the docum .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates