9911796707
TMI Blog1967 (7) TMI 61X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... follows : M/s. A.S. Bava, hereinafter referred to as the petitioner, is a firm of dealers in Tobacco. By two orders of adjudication, dated March 31, 1963, the Assistant Collector of Customs demanded the payment of duty under Rule 40 of the Central Excises and Salt Rules, 1944. The petitioner filed appeals against these orders on or about July 4, 1963, to the Collector of Customs and Central Excise. The petitioner made a representation on October 3, 1963, requesting that it may not be required to deposit the duty demanded pending appeal. The Collector, by letter, dated January 9, 1964, rejected the representation and requested the petitioner to deposit the duty within 15 days of the receipt of the letter. On the petitioner failing to deposit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on 129 of the Customs Act was good. 4. There is no force in the first point. First, the point was not taken in the High Court. Secondly, it is settled that the existence of a remedy by way of revision does not bar the jurisdiction of the High Court to entertain a petition under Article 226. Moreover, the petitioner had alleged that the Collector had no jurisdiction to demand the deposit or duty pending the appeals as the notification dated May 4, 1963, was bad in so far as it applied Section 129 of the Customs Act. In these circumstances it was not necessary for the petitioner to have filed revisions. 5. There is equally no force in the second point. If the petitioner had not applied for dispensation of the deposit of the duty, appellants ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ere the decision or order appealed against relates to any duty demanded in respect of goods which are not under the control of customs authorities or any penalty levied under this Act, any person desirous of appealing against such decision or order shall, pending the appeal, deposit with the proper officer the duty demanded or the penalty levied : Provided that where in any particular case the appellate authority is of opinion that the deposit of duty demanded or penalty levied will cause undue hardship to the appellant, it may in its discretion dispense with such deposit, either unconditionally or subject to such conditions as it may deem fit. (2) If upon any such appeal it is decided that the whole or any portion of such duty or penalty ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... penalty or both as the appellant may admit to be due from him, has been paid." It was amended thus : "22.(1) Any dealer aggrieved by an order under this Act, may in the prescribed manner appeal to the prescribed authority against the order : Provided that no appeal against an order of assessment with or without penalty shall be admitted by the said authority unless such appeal is accompanied by a satisfactory proof of the payment of the tax, with penalty, if any, in respect of which the appeal has been preferred." 10. S.R. Das J., as he then was, repelled the argument of the learned Advocate that "the requirement as to the deposit of the amount of the assessed tax does not affect the right of appeal itself, which still remains intact, b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
