2025 (1) TMI 1354

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The contention of the Petitioner that the principles of natural justice were not followed is correct. It clarified that the proceedings shall be conducted de novo by the Respondent No. 1. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open in this regard.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU For the Petitioners Through: Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar, Adv. For the Respondents Through: Ms. A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re violated by Respondent No. 1. 2.1 These contentions of the Petitioners are refuted by the learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1. 3. A Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 05.08.2020 had stayed the operation of the Impugned Order. The stay has continued since then. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that during the pendency of the proceedings, Respondent No. 1 has now provided the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and Respondent No. 1 may mutually schedule such additional hearings amongst themselves as well; (v) The Respondent No. 1 shall ensure that any additional documents/information needed, are obtained from the Petitioners expeditiously so as not to delay adjudication; (vi) Once the hearing in the matter is concluded, the Respondent No. 1 shall pass a reasoned Speaking Order within a period of 12 w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X