9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (2) TMI 97X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... king yard at Varanasi, needs investigation inasmuch as the conduct as projected by counsel for the respondents and which is not denied, despite the fact that petitioner had full 15 days to claim the ownership of the goods, no steps were taken and thereafter also the matter has been dealt with casually, the assertions made in the petition cannot be taken at face value. There are no reason to enter ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... asi as the borrower, had failed to make payment in terms of the arbitration award, however, the vehicle carrying the goods and the goods were detained and penalty imposed where after, the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner seeking ownership of the goods in question, based on passing of the award and hypothecation of vehicle, was rejected by the respondents. The writ petition was filed on ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ised by the petitioner. Whereafter also, despite being aware of the passing of the order dated 18.07.2024, a cursory email titling the same as GST appeal was sent on 06.09.2024 and, as noticed, the petition has been filed on 21.10.2024. 5. Submissions have been made that the petitioner has remedy of filing an appeal against the order impugned and as the matter remained pending before this Court, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
