2025 (2) TMI 357

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 01.02.2018 to 31.03.2018, the goods which were being transported by the petitioner were not covered with the requirement of the E-way bill. This view was taken by the Division Bench of this Court in M/S Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & Others [2018 (9) TMI 1261 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT], wherein it has been held that the goods were not covered with the requirement of E-wa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... E-way Bill was not present with the goods. 4. It is admitted to the State-respondents that during the period from 01.02.2018 to 31.03.2018, the goods which were being transported by the petitioner were not covered with the requirement of the E-way bill. This view was taken by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Tax No. 587 of 2018 (M/S Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X