1980 (11) TMI 52

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he submissions made at the time of personal hearing as well as the written submissions sent after the hearing. 2. In the show cause notice Government had expressed a tentative view that bagasse was neither intermediate goods nor component parts of any other goods produced in the factory and therefore, the Appellate Collector appeared to have erred in allowing the benefit of Notification 77/75 t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... me barred, Government observe that the assessee has failed to prove that the proper officer at any time gave his approval that the bagasse manufactured by the assessee was non-excisable. The Assistant Collector has already adequately and correctly dealt with the points regarding time-bar and valuation for the purpose of determining the assessable value, 4. Government accordingly confirm the ten .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X