2025 (2) TMI 671

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... een done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 8674/2025 (for exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 1806/2025 & CM APPL. 8673/2025 3. The Petitioner has filed the present petition under Aricle 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved, inter alia, by the ex parte impugned order dated 5th August, 2024 (hereinafter "impugned order") which arose .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is Court in Marg Erp Ltd. through its Authorised Representative Mr. Mehender Singh v. Commissioner of DGST Delhi & Anr. (2023:DHC:905-DB) wherein the Court has clearly held that an unsigned notice or order would not be sustainable in law. The relevant portions of the said judgment are set out below: - "14. Concededly, the impugned order cannot be sustained as it is unsigned. This issue is covere .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... reply to the notice dated 1.1.2021 and 6.2.2021. The said reply be filed within a period of two weeks from today. 18. The authority concerned shall pass an order afresh after affording the petitioner, an opportunity to be heard." 6. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the prayer for quashing of the Impugned Notifications is not pressed by him. 7. Ld. Counsel for the Respondents has no .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X