2025 (2) TMI 670

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2025
W. A. NO. 289 OF 2025 - -
GST
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A. K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S. FOR THE PETITIONER : BY ADV.SRI.K.N.SREEKUMARAN BY ADV.SRI.P.J.ANILKUMAR (A-1768) BY ADV.SRI.S.JAFFERALI FOR THE RESPONDENT : BY SRI.V.GIRISH KUMAR, STANDING COUNSEL JUDGMENT Dr. A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J. This Writ Appeal is preferred by the petit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e learned Single Judge, who considered the matter, found that the appellant had not appeared on the date fixed for hearing namely, 06.01.2025, and it was under those circumstances that the proper officer had proceeded to pass Ext.P6 impugned order. It was found, therefore, that the appellant could not allege a violation of natural justice since it was his own lapse that resulted in the order being .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... icated as 27.12.2024, and the personal hearing was fixed at 12.10 p.m. on 06.01.2025. As against this, Ext.P4 reply appears to have been sent by the appellant on 24.12.2024 and received by the respondent by 27.12.2024. Thereafter, during the period between 27.12.2024 and 06.01.2025, the appellant appears to have done nothing in the form of submission of additional material for which time was sough .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X