9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (2) TMI 851X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... under Article 226 of the Constitution of India - HELD THAT:- The High Court ought not to have rejected the petition on the ground that the statutory period provided under sub-Section (5) of Section 5 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 had not expired before the writ petition was filed. The High Court ought to have noticed that there was no statutory remedy available to the appellant t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in, Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Hitarth Raja, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. The appellant filed a writ petition challenging an order of provisional attachment of the property of the appellant. 4. The High Court has declined to entertain the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt to challenge the order of provisional attachment. Therefore, we set aside the impugned order and restore Civil Writ Petition No.24420/2024 (O&M) to the file of the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh. The restored petition shall be listed before the roster Bench of the High Court on 21st February, 2025 in the morning. The appellant and the respondents shall be under an obligation to app ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
