TMI Blog2025 (2) TMI 1010X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o doubt that the petitioner is liable to pay GST @ 18% on the taxable turnover arising out of the contract with the 1st respondent. However, the 1st respondent had only reimbursed @12% instead of 18%. The contention of the petitioner that the contract between the petitioner and the 1st respondent required the 1st respondent to reimburse the entire amount of GST paid by the petitioner, has not bee ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ontract with the 1st respondent. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... efit could not be available for government corporations. On account of this stipulation by the authorities, the petitioner was called upon to pay GST @ 18%. 3. It was on this question that the petitioner had approached the authority for advance ruling on clarification as to the rate of tax payable by the petitioner. The Authority for Advance Ruling had held that the petitioner was liable to pay G ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... unt of GST paid by the petitioner, has not been contradicted. In such circumstances, it must be held that the 1st respondent was liable to reimburse the petitioner to the extent of the GST paid out by the petitioner and accordingly, the 1st respondent is liable to reimburse the petitioner the differential amount of GST @ 6%, for the period for which the petitioner ended up paying GST @ 18%. Needle ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|