Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2025 (2) TMI 1069

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t of tax in its Income Tax Return. As per the assessee, the assessee had deducted tax during the year amounting to Rs. 1,32,68,202/- but due to technical glitches TDS deducted to the tune of Rs. 52,95,646/- was only updated by the software in the return of income. Therefore, the assessee had made an application for seeking rectification of mistake. Undisputedly, it is not the case of the revenue that the tax deducted as per Form No. 26AS was only Rs. 52,95,646/- as uploaded by the assessee. It is incumbent upon the assessing authority to ensure that the credit of tax deducted at source has been given as per Form No. 26AS. AO has not brought any materials to rebut this fact. Even otherwise also, it is not the case of AO that tax so deducted .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 05.03.2024, pertaining to the assessment year 2020-21. For the sake of convenience, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order. The Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal: - "(i) Law and on facts of the case by deciding the case in favour of the assessee relying on the premise that matter before him for adjudication is pertaining to not giving the TDS credit of Rs. 79,72,554/as per 26AS statement and ignoring the very fact of the matter that the assessee did not even claim such TDS to the tune of Rs. 79,72,554/in its ITR. (ii) Law and on facts of the case by giving relief of Rs. 79,72,554/hol .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act. This petition was rejected by the Competent Authority. Aggrieved against rejection of application u/s 154 of the Act, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes. Thereby he directed the Assessing Officer to give credit for the prepaid taxes. Aggrieved against this, both the Revenue and the Assessee have filed appeal and cross-objection respectively. 4. Apropos to the grounds of appeal, the Ld. DR supported the action of the Assessing Authority and also pointed out that the assessee had also approached to the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Allahabad, by way of an application u/s 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he income Tax Act, 1961. 7. In view of the above, the appeal of the appellant is allowed for statistical purpose." 7. We do not see any infirmity in the impugned order. The tax-payer should not be subjected to harassment merely on the basis of some mistake occurred due to technical glitch of software. 8. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Aluminium Corporation of India Ltd vs Union of India & Ors (1975) 2 SCC 472 has observed as under: "If we may anticipate our ultimate conclusion even at the opening stage, this appeal deserves to be allowed as a matter of law but what is more significant for society are three unhappy features which, we feel confident, the State will seriously consider. They are: (a) that good government inv .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s and circumstances of the present case. Thus, looking to the material placed before us and the finding of the Ld. CIT(A), we are of the view that the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in directing the Assessing Officer to give credit to the tax deducted at source. Therefore, we do not see any reason to interfere in the finding of the Ld. CIT(A). The grounds of appeal of the Revenue are hereby dismissed. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed. 10. Now, coming to cross objection filed by the assessee. The only grievance is against the non-payment of interest on the refund due. Ld. Counsel contended that the case of the assessee is that the AO did not give credit of taxes deducted. Had the credit been given there would have been r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates