Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2025 (2) TMI 1055

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... under Union of India, and as such there could have been no malafide intention to evade payment of tax on the part of their official, as none of the employee severally or jointly is benefited by evading the service tax, and none has any personal gain. The Ld. Additional commissioner has also observed that the discrepancy has come to the knowledge of the Department during investigation subsequent to Audit of the appellant conducted by the Departmental officers for the period 16.07.2001 to 31.03.2005 on 13/31.12.2005. The Order-in-Original, the additional Commissioner has dropped the penalty under Section 76,77 and 78 by holding that malafide intention cannot be inferred on the part of the appellant which is a government of India undertaking .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in providing the services of Scientific & Technical Consultancy, Consulting Engineering, Repair & Maintenance, Business Auxiliary and GTA Services. During the scrutiny of the records by the audit it was observed that the appellant had entered into an agreement with M/s Eon Infotech Ltd, on 30.7.01 to work together to promote Very Large Scale Integrated Circuits (hereinafter referred to as "VLSI") education, design and training by setting up Centres at Chandigarh and Mohali and the appellant became "Franchiser" and M/s Eon Infotech became "Master Franchisee" of the appellant. The Franchiser prescribed the standards for course and duration for training and different courses of studies. The appellant named the course as "VEDANT". The Franchis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he present appeal. 3. Heard both the parties and perused the material on record. 4. Ld. consultant Dr. A.S. Gill appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that the impugned order is not sustainable in law as the same has been passed without properly appreciating the facts and the law and the binding judicial precedents. He further submits that the appellant is a part of the Department of space, Government of India and has entered into a agreement with EON Infotech Ltd, Chandigarh on 23.07.2001 to work together to promote very large scale integrated circles, education design and training. The said course was named as VEDANT a vocational training course for engineering graduates. 4.1 He further submits that on the basis of audit objec .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g. He further submits that the appellant being a Govt. organization are not going to gain anything by non payment of due taxes and deposited the amount in respect of audit para 1 along with interest for the entire period including the period beyond extended period of five years before issuance of show cause notice. He further submits that the Ld. Additional Commissioner while dropping the penalty under Section 76, 77 and 78 has observed in para 4.10 that extended period cannot be invoked as there is no malafide intention to evade payment of tax on the part of the appellant which is a Government of India undertaking. He further submits that the Revenue has not challenged the findings of the Additional Commissioner dropping the penalty and th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ord were exchanged between the appellant and the respondent and as per these correspondences the allegations of the department was that the appellant is liable to pay service tax on commercial training and coaching, wherein the show cause notice was issued on 19.10.2009 for the period from 01.04.2004 to 30.09.2007 by invoking the extended period. The allegations of the department is that appellant is liable to pay service tax under a franchisees service. 7. Further, we find that the entire demand has been confirmed by invoking the extended period; we also find that the additional commissioner in the Order-in-Original has observed in para 4.10 that the appellant being a part of Ministry of Space under Union of India, and as such there could .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates