TMI Blog2025 (3) TMI 608X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etitioner : Mr. N. Balasubramanian For the Respondents : Mr. R. Nandakumar for R.1 & R.2, Mr. S. Jeyasingh Standing Counsel for R.3 JUDGMENT Heard both sides. 2. The petitioner is an exporter of pharmaceuticals and surgical goods. He paid a sum of Rs. 12,72,827/- towards IGST. The petitioner's case comes under what is known as Zero Rated Supply. The petitioner sought refund of the IGST acc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|