Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1979 (2) TMI 115

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d to as the 'Quality Control Act'), why their goods should not be confiscated under Sections 113 and 118(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, and why penalty under Section 114 of the Customs Act should not be imposed upon them. Ext. P2 reply was sent by the exporters but their explanation as rejected by Ext.P3 order of the Collector of Customs (the 3rd respondent herein). The Collector held that the prohibition contained in the notification issued under Section 6 of the Quality Control Act was violated and that the goods were therefore liable to be confiscated. He however gave the exporters an option to pay a sum of Rs. 12,000/- in lieu of confiscation. The Collector further imposed a penalty of Rs. 20,000/-on the exporters under Section 114 of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion 113(d) and Section 118(b) of the Customs Act. Although Section 11(2) (h) was mentioned in Ext. P1 notice, it appear to have been given up in the orders subsequently passed. There is no reference to Section 113(1) or Section 50 of the Customs Act. The power vested in the authorities by virtue of Clause 10A of the Exports (Control) Order, 1969 read with the provisions of the Import and Export (Control) Act, 1947 does not appear to have been invoked. 5. I shall now refer to the provisions of law relied on by the department in support of the impugned orders. The object of the Quality Control Act is the sound development of the export trade. An agency competent to issue quality control certificate has been set up under the Act. The notifi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... it is not denied that the goods in question were covered by valid certificates and that it was under such certificates that they reached the Wharf. These certificates were evidence as to quality, and the goods covered by them were presumed to be export-worthy. The presumption disappears only when, upon a subsequent examination, it is found that the goods are in fact not export-worthy. 6. It is possible that even in the case of goods which were certified to be of proper quality, an exporter can be penalised in cases where he knowingly makes a wrong statement as to the quality of the goods. Section 50 of the Customs Act, 1962 requires the exporter to make a statement as to quality. It reads :- "50. Entry of goods for exportation. - (1) T .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hipping bill or other documents." Section 3(2) of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act says that any violation of the requirement of a tribunal statement under Clause 10A of the Exports (Control) Order it deemed to be a violation of the prohibitions under Section 11 of the Customs Act, thereby bringing the operation all the provisions of the Customs Act, including those contained under Section 113(1). I have referred to Section 50 and Section 113(1) of the Customs Act and Clause 10A of the Exports (Control) Order, and Section 3(2) of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, only to show with what powers the Customs Authorities are clothed in case an exporter knowingly makes wrong statements as to the quality of goods. In the present case n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... c. - The following export goods shall be liable to confiscation :- (d) any goods attempted to be exported or brought within the limits of any customs area for the purpose of being exported, contrary to any prohibition imposed by or under this Act or any other law for the time being in force; * * * * Admittedly no attempt had been made to export these goods after they were declared unexportworthy. Until the goods were brought to the Wharf and subjected to as examination, no attempt had been made to export them contrary to any prohibition imposed by or under the Customs Act or any other law for the time being in force. The certificates which operated, until they were cancelled after the subsequent examination on the Wharf, were suffici .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates