1989 (7) TMI 114

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . and Another for allowing the refund to the petitioner of a sum of Rs.10,28,535.62. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner argued before us that the Assistant Collector, Central Excise has erroneously granted exemption to the petitioner w.e.f. 1st June, 1986, when as a matter of fact it was entitled to exemption w.e.f. the date of filing of the application i.e. 1st of April, 1986, Sri Bharat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is produced before him by the petitioner. 3. So far as the point for the period for which, it was not required to pay the tax is concerned, the same shall be decided by the Assistant Collector himself. We restrain ourselves from expressing any opinion this. 4. Let a certified copy of this order be given to the learned Counsel for the petitioner today, on payment of usual charges. - - T .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X