1990 (1) TMI 77

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ovember 1, 1980 and the Notification dated June 19,1980 and the proceedings relating to demand of basic duty of custom and countervailing in excess of Rs. 2.37 P. per kg. on the 597 bales of Viscose Staple Fibre imported by the petitioner No. 1 per RSS "Link Harmony" and seeking other consequential reliefs on the ground that the Notifications dated January 5, 1979 as amended by Notification dated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s and/or representations made in the said earlier notifications, whereas by the impugned notifications, the respondents are seeking to go back and/or are resiling from promises and/or representations and the proceedings as challenged in the writ petition are illegal and void. 2. Mr. Bajoria, the learned Counsel for the petitioners has made lengthy submissions to the extent that the present case .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pel, the petitioners have got to demonstrate as to how they have been affected and as to how there is prejudice towards their rights. It has got to be proved beyond doubts that by the proposed actions, the petitioners' rights have been affected in such a way that they may not sustain the loss. It is not open to them to challenge the notification as it is. The Govenment has rights and to formulate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X